Hurricane born in Africa defies expectations to attack US coast

Advertisement

The tropical wave started off Africa’s west coast in early October. It took its time, perhaps two weeks, to make the 4,500-mile trek to the warm waters of the Caribbean. The turbulence it stirred didn’t catch the attention of weather watchers like Jeff Masters until Oct. 15.

The National Hurricane Center soon designated it an Invest, a low-pressure system innocuous yet worthy of investigation. Even after meteorologists elevated it to TD 18, shorthand for a tropical depression, they assumed it would fizzle.

“We expected it to lose strength after Jamaica, and it didn’t,” said Masters, founder of Ann Arbor, Mich.-based Weather Underground, a commercial weather service. “We expected Cuba to tear it apart, and it didn’t. As it headed north we expected it to decay some, as most storms do, but it didn’t.”

On Oct. 22, Sandy was officially born, troublesome beyond belief — “a freak storm, unprecedented in so many respects,” Masters said. The destroyer that came out of nowhere produced winds reaching farther than any known Atlantic hurricane. It took dozens of lives, cost billions of dollars, plunged millions into darkness and created nightmare scenarios that not even the disaster planners anticipated.

Whatever the final cost, it already has renewed debate over both the possible influence of climate change on the storm’s movement and the preparedness of states and cities to handle increasingly violent weather events.

“We see 10 to 12 named tropical storms per season on average,” said Annes Haseemkunju, an atmospheric scientist at Eqecat, a risk-management company in Oakland, Calif. “This season we already have 19 named storms, and there’s one more month to go.”

Greater frequency will force authorities to bolster the defenses of their communities, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a news conference Tuesday in Manhattan, where the city’s subway system is flooded and may take weeks to recover.

“We have a new reality when it comes to these weather patterns and we have an old infrastructure, and that is not a good combination,” Cuomo said. “We have 100-year floods every two years now.”

What made this storm so unusual was that it merged with a low-pressure system moving eastward across the continental United States that fueled its intensity while a high-pressure system over northeastern Canada blocked the storm’s path, forcing it to turn westward and strike the East Coast, said Sharan Majumdar, associate professor of meteorology and physical oceanography at the University of Miami in Florida.

“Many times when hurricanes develop, they move out to sea,” Majumdar said. “This is a once-in-a-lifetime storm in terms of all of these factors acting in concert together. It’s very, very rare.”

The storm was fueled by an unusually warm Atlantic Ocean, giving warm water supply to the storm, said Matt Rogers, a meteorologist and president of the Commodity Weather Group, a Bethesda, Md.-based energy and agriculture commodities consulting company.

“It wasn’t just a pure hurricane,” Rogers said. “It actually converted into an extra-tropical system. It’s a hybrid — part tropical and part nor’easter.”

Sandy’s path, aided by the warm water and low air pressure, defied expectations. In doing so, it prompted public discussion about the potential causes, including climate change.

Linking a single storm to climate is very difficult, though climate change itself is well understood on a global level. Earth’s average temperature has warmed about 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit since 1900, most of which is very likely due to human greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2007 report.

Identifying causes of a storm as complex as Sandy, and determining whether climate change was among them, is challenging, said Randall Dole, deputy director for research at a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Scientists hunt for a climate-change fingerprint by experimenting with computerized models.

“You have to reconstruct a world that might have been,” Dole said. “And to do that you need to estimate the human influence on sea-surface temperatures” and any other trends showing human influence.

Advertisement

Comments

oneStarman says...

The SUPERSTORM that hit this year was the 2nd in a row that was called 'The Storm of the Century'. Is This the New Normal? Lower Manhattan and the Rest of the country took a bigger economic hit from America's REAL Enemies this week than we did on 9/11. The Coal Barons and Oil Sheikhs that are paying the same people who put ads on TV in the '50s to convince US that the Brand of Cigarette they were hawking was the HEALTHY Kind - are NOW Trying to convince US you can't draw a correlation between a Never Before Seen STRING of Climate Catastrophes occurring all over the globe and the Burning of Fossil Fuels raising the atmospheric CO2 equivalents above the highest safe level of 350ppm a few years ago to 400ppm today.
We NEED the Kind of Response we had on 9/11 "THIS Changes EVERYTHING" We Need to FIGHT to Save Our earth and Our Grandchildren's Future by Banning the Burning of Coal and Gasoline and convert the cars we drive to work to Battery Power and put Solar Panels on Our roofs to charge Them and so we can shut down the 600 Coal Plants that produce 40% of the TOTAL CO2 Emissions in the USA. Those Two Things which could Save US would cost about $25,000 per Family and could be financed by a $5,000 a Year Credit Paid for by Billionaires and Oil and Coal Companies paying their Fair Share of TAXES rather than being SUBSIDIZED by the Middle Class.

Posted 31 October 2012, 11:59 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment